Icons for Memory Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 35)
Monday, May 10th, 2010Today we introduce an icon for Waiting Thread Time (kernel dumps) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Waiting Thread Time (kernel dumps) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
My drive to generalization led me to place an adornment on the portal to highlight the fact that memory and software trace analysis patterns are under an umbrella of general software behaviour patterns:

http://www.dumpanalysis.org/Software-Behavior-Patterns-Headline
In the forthcoming post series I plan to write about similarities between these two branches and also provide pattern examples from non-Windows platforms. All this material will provide the foundation for the forthcoming book Software Behavior: A Guide to Systematic Analysis (ISBN: 978-1906717162).
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Previously announced book is now available on Amazon:
Memory Dump Analysis Anthology: Color Supplement for Volumes 1-3
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Sometimes when a high number of interrupts is reported but there are no signs of an interrupt storm or pending DPCs in a memory dump file it is useful to search for Hardware Activity in running and / or suspected threads. This can be done by examining execution residue left on a thread raw stack. Although found driver activity might not be related to reported problems it can be a useful start for driver elimination procedure for the general recommendation to check drivers for any updates. Here is an example of a thread raw stack with a network card doing “Scatter-Gather” DMA (more extensive example is coming in a separate pattern cooperation case study):
1: kd> !thread
THREAD f7732090 Cid 0000.0000 Teb: 00000000 Win32Thread: 00000000 RUNNING on processor 1
Not impersonating
Owning Process 8089db40 Image: Idle
Attached Process N/A Image: N/A
Wait Start TickCount 0 Ticks: 24437545 (4:10:03:56.640)
Context Switch Count 75624870
UserTime 00:00:00.000
KernelTime 4 Days 08:56:05.125
Stack Init f78b3000 Current f78b2d4c Base f78b3000 Limit f78b0000 Call 0
Priority 0 BasePriority 0 PriorityDecrement 0
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
f3b30c5c 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 LiveKdD+0x1c07
1: kd> dds f78b0000 f78b3000
f78b0000 00000000
f78b0004 00000000
f78b0008 00000000
f78b000c 00000000
f78b0010 00000000
[...]
f78b2870 8b3de0d0
f78b2874 80887b75 nt!KiFlushTargetSingleTb+0xd
f78b2878 8b49032c
f78b287c 00000000
f78b2880 2d003202
f78b2884 00000000
f78b2888 00000000
f78b288c 2d003202
f78b2890 8b490302
f78b2894 f78b28a4
f78b2898 80a61456 hal!KfLowerIrql+0x62
f78b289c 2d00320a
f78b28a0 00000000
f78b28a4 8b3de0d0
f78b28a8 8b3e3730
f78b28ac 00341eb0
f78b28b0 f78b2918
f78b28b4 f63fbf78 NetworkAdapterA!SendWithScatterGather+0×318
f78b28b8 8b3de0d0
f78b28bc 8b341eb0
f78b28c0 f78b28d4
f78b28c4 00000000
f78b28c8 80a5f3c0 hal!KfAcquireSpinLock
f78b28cc 00000000
f78b28d0 8b3de0d0
f78b28d4 00000000
f78b28d8 8b3de0d0
f78b28dc 8b3eb730
f78b28e0 005a7340
f78b28e4 f78b294c
f78b28e8 f63fbf78 NetworkAdapterA!SendWithScatterGather+0×318
f78b28ec 8b3de0d0
f78b28f0 8a5a7340
f78b28f4 f78b2908
f78b28f8 00000000
f78b28fc 8b3de0d0
f78b2900 8b0f5158
f78b2904 001e2340
f78b2908 f78b2970
f78b290c f63fbf78 NetworkAdapterA!SendWithScatterGather+0×318
f78b2910 8b3de0d0
f78b2914 8b1e2340
f78b2918 f78b292c
f78b291c 00000000
f78b2920 80a5f3c0 hal!KfAcquireSpinLock
f78b2924 00000000
f78b2928 8b3de0d0
f78b292c 00000000
f78b2930 8b3eb700
f78b2934 00000000
f78b2938 00000000
f78b293c 00000000
f78b2940 00000000
f78b2944 00000000
f78b2948 00000000
f78b294c 0a446aa2
f78b2950 f78b29b8
f78b2954 8b0f5158
f78b2958 8b01ce10
f78b295c 00000001
f78b2960 8b3de0d0
f78b2964 80a5f302 hal!HalpPerfInterrupt+0×32
f78b2968 00000001
f78b296c 8b3de0d0
f78b2970 80a5f302 hal!HalpPerfInterrupt+0×32
f78b2974 8b3de302
f78b2978 f78b2988
f78b297c 80a61456 hal!KfLowerIrql+0×62
f78b2980 80a5f3c0 hal!KfAcquireSpinLock
f78b2984 8b3de302
f78b2988 f78b29a4
f78b298c 80a5f44b hal!KfReleaseSpinLock+0xb
f78b2990 f63fbbbf NetworkAdapterA!SendPackets+0×1b3
f78b2994 8a446a90
f78b2998 8b0e8ab0
f78b299c 00000000
f78b29a0 008b29d0
f78b29a4 f78b29bc
f78b29a8 f7163790 NDIS!ndisMProcessSGList+0×90
f78b29ac 8b3de388
f78b29b0 f78b29d0
f78b29b4 00000001
f78b29b8 00000000
f78b29bc f78b29e8
f78b29c0 80a60147 hal!HalBuildScatterGatherList+0×1c7
f78b29c4 8b0e89b0
f78b29c8 00000000
f78b29cc 8a44cde8
f78b29d0 8b1e2340
f78b29d4 8a446aa2
f78b29d8 8b026ca0
f78b29dc 8b1e2340
f78b29e0 8b0e8ab0
f78b29e4 8b0e8ab0
f78b29e8 f78b2a44
f78b29ec f716369f NDIS!ndisMAllocSGList+0xda
f78b29f0 8a44cde8
f78b29f4 8b0e89b0
f78b29f8 8a446a70
f78b29fc 00000000
f78b2a00 00000036
f78b2a04 f7163730 NDIS!ndisMProcessSGList
f78b2a08 8b1e2340
f78b2a0c 00000000
f78b2a10 8a44cde8
f78b2a14 00000218
f78b2a18 8b1e2308
f78b2a1c 00000103
f78b2a20 8b0e8ab0
f78b2a24 8a446a70
f78b2a28 8a44cde8
f78b2a2c 00000036
f78b2a30 8b0e8ab0
f78b2a34 00000036
f78b2a38 00000000
f78b2a3c 00000000
f78b2a40 029a9e02
f78b2a44 f78b2a60
f78b2a48 f71402ff NDIS!ndisMSendX+0×1dd
f78b2a4c 8b490310
f78b2a50 8b1e2340
f78b2a54 8a446a70
f78b2a58 8a9a9e02
f78b2a5c 8a9a9e02
f78b2a60 f78b2a88
f78b2a64 f546c923 tcpip!ARPSendData+0×1a9
f78b2a68 8b3e76c8
f78b2a6c 8b1e2340
f78b2a70 8a9a9ea8
f78b2a74 8b490310
f78b2a78 80888b00 nt!RtlBackoff+0×68
f78b2a7c 8a446a70
f78b2a80 8a446aa2
f78b2a84 8a446a70
f78b2a88 f78b2ab4
f78b2a8c f546ba5d tcpip!ARPTransmit+0×112
f78b2a90 8b490310
f78b2a94 8b1e2340
f78b2a98 8a9a9ea8
f78b2a9c 00000103
f78b2aa0 8a446a70
f78b2aa4 00000000
f78b2aa8 8b342398
f78b2aac 8a47e1f8
f78b2ab0 8b1e2340
f78b2ab4 f78b2bf0
f78b2ab8 f546c4fc tcpip!_IPTransmit+0×866
f78b2abc 8a9a9ebc
f78b2ac0 f78b2b02
f78b2ac4 00000001
[…]
We also do a sanity check for coincidental symbols:
1: kd> ub f63fbf78
NetworkAdapterA!SendWithScatterGather+0x304:
f63fbf64 push eax
f63fbf65 push edi
f63fbf66 push esi
f63fbf67 mov dword ptr [ebp-44h],ecx
f63fbf6a mov dword ptr [ebp-3Ch],ecx
f63fbf6d mov dword ptr [ebp-34h],ecx
f63fbf70 mov dword ptr [ebp-2Ch],ecx
f63fbf73 call NetworkAdapterA!PacketRetrieveNicActions (f63facd2)
1: kd> ub f63fbbbf
NetworkAdapterA!SendPackets+0x190:
f63fbb9c cmp dword ptr [esi+0Ch],2
f63fbba0 jl NetworkAdapterA!SendPackets+0x19e (f63fbbaa)
f63fbba2 mov dword ptr [ecx+3818h],eax
f63fbba8 jmp NetworkAdapterA!SendPackets+0x1a4 (f63fbbb0)
f63fbbaa mov dword ptr [ecx+438h],eax
f63fbbb0 mov dl,byte ptr [esi+2BCh]
f63fbbb6 mov ecx,dword ptr [ebp+8]
f63fbbb9 call dword ptr [NetworkAdapterA!_imp_KfReleaseSpinLock (f640ca18)]
1: kd> ub 80a60147
hal!HalBuildScatterGatherList+0x1b0:
80a60130 je hal!HalBuildScatterGatherList+0x1b9 (80a60139)
80a60132 mov dword ptr [eax+4],1
80a60139 push dword ptr [ebp+20h]
80a6013c push eax
80a6013d mov eax,dword ptr [ebp+0Ch]
80a60140 push dword ptr [eax+14h]
80a60143 push eax
80a60144 call dword ptr [ebp+1Ch]
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
This is a variation of Hooked Functions pattern for kernel space. In addition to trampoline patching we also see a modified service table:
0: kd> !chkimg -lo 50 -d !nt -v
Searching for module with expression: !nt
Will apply relocation fixups to file used for comparison
Will ignore NOP/LOCK errors
Will ignore patched instructions
Image specific ignores will be applied
Comparison image path: c:\mss\ntkrnlmp.exe\4B7A8E62280000\ntkrnlmp.exe
No range specified
Scanning section: .text
Size: 625257
Range to scan: 80801000-80899a69
808373e3-808373e9 7 bytes - nt!KeAcquireQueuedSpinLockAtDpcLevel+1b
[ f7 41 04 01 00 00 00:e9 00 0d b2 76 cc cc ]
8083e6c8-8083e6cb 4 bytes - nt!KiServiceTable+440 (+0×72e5)
[ 98 4e 98 80:d0 66 e9 f4 ]
80840605-8084060a 6 bytes - nt!KxFlushEntireTb+9 (+0×1f3d)
[ ff 15 1c 10 80 80:e9 a5 7a b1 76 cc ]
Total bytes compared: 625257(100%)
Number of errors: 17
Scanning section: MISYSPTE
Size: 1906
Range to scan: 8089a000-8089a772
Total bytes compared: 1906(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: POOLMI
Size: 7868
Range to scan: 8089b000-8089cebc
Total bytes compared: 7868(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: POOLCODE
Size: 7754
Range to scan: 8089d000-8089ee4a
Total bytes compared: 7754(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: PAGE
Size: 1097281
Range to scan: 808bc000-809c7e41
Total bytes compared: 1097281(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: PAGELK
Size: 63633
Range to scan: 809c8000-809d7891
Total bytes compared: 63633(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: PAGEWMI
Size: 7095
Range to scan: 809ef000-809f0bb7
Total bytes compared: 7095(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: PAGEKD
Size: 16760
Range to scan: 809f1000-809f5178
Total bytes compared: 16760(100%)
Number of errors: 0
Scanning section: PAGEHDLS
Size: 7508
Range to scan: 809f7000-809f8d54
Total bytes compared: 7508(100%)
Number of errors: 0
17 errors : !nt (808373e3-8084060a)
0: kd> dds 8083e6c8
8083e6c8 f4e966d0 DriverA+0×20d8
8083e6cc 80983436 nt!NtUnloadKey2
8083e6d0 809837b5 nt!NtUnloadKeyEx
8083e6d4 8091cec8 nt!NtUnlockFile
8083e6d8 80805d80 nt!NtUnlockVirtualMemory
8083e6dc 80937630 nt!NtUnmapViewOfSection
8083e6e0 808e7154 nt!NtVdmControl
8083e6e4 809c6ba3 nt!NtWaitForDebugEvent
8083e6e8 8092dc24 nt!NtWaitForMultipleObjects
8083e6ec 8092ccf4 nt!NtWaitForSingleObject
8083e6f0 809c132f nt!NtWaitHighEventPair
8083e6f4 809c12c3 nt!NtWaitLowEventPair
8083e6f8 80925c8d nt!NtWriteFile
8083e6fc 80901790 nt!NtWriteFileGather
8083e700 8091214c nt!NtWriteRequestData
8083e704 8093e63b nt!NtWriteVirtualMemory
8083e708 80822751 nt!NtYieldExecution
8083e70c 808c7c46 nt!NtCreateKeyedEvent
8083e710 8093eee3 nt!NtOpenKeyedEvent
8083e714 809c1ee8 nt!NtReleaseKeyedEvent
8083e718 809c2183 nt!NtWaitForKeyedEvent
8083e71c 809a610b nt!NtQueryPortInformationProcess
8083e720 809a6123 nt!NtGetCurrentProcessorNumber
8083e724 809a1849 nt!NtWaitForMultipleObjects32
8083e728 90909090
8083e72c 1c0d3b90
8083e730 0f8089f1
8083e734 037aaa85
8083e738 00c1f700
8083e73c 0fffff00
8083e740 037a9e85
8083e744 9090c300
0: kd> u 808373e3
nt!KeAcquireQueuedSpinLockAtDpcLevel+0×1b:
808373e3 jmp DriverB+0×10e8 (f73580e8)
808373e8 int 3
808373e9 int 3
808373ea je nt!KeAcquireQueuedSpinLockAtDpcLevel+0×12 (808373da)
808373ec pause
808373ee jmp nt!KeAcquireQueuedSpinLockAtDpcLevel+0×1b (808373e3)
nt!KeReleaseInStackQueuedSpinLockFromDpcLevel:
808373f0 lea ecx,[ecx]
nt!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLockFromDpcLevel:
808373f2 mov eax,ecx
0: kd> u 80840605
nt!KxFlushEntireTb+0×9:
80840605 jmp DriverB+0×10af (f73580af)
8084060a int 3
8084060b mov byte ptr [ebp-1],al
8084060e mov ebx,offset nt!KiTbFlushTimeStamp (808a7100)
80840613 mov ecx,dword ptr [nt!KiTbFlushTimeStamp (808a7100)]
80840619 test cl,1
8084061c jne nt!KxFlushEntireTb+0×19 (8082cd8d)
80840622 mov eax,ecx
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Truncated Dump pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Managed Code Exception pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Stack Overflow (user mode) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Stack Overflow (kernel mode) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
It is time to start being systematic. In addition to all-encompassing multi-volume Memory Dump Analysis Anthology OpenTask starts Systematic Software Fault Analysis series with Crash Dump Analysis: Practical Foundations as the first book. It introduces basic definitions, tools, memory dump collection and preliminary analysis methods for Windows platforms including legacy versions. This practical reference guide is a must have for system administrators of Windows server platforms and client workstations, technical support engineers and general Windows users. It builds foundation for the second book Crash Dump Analysis for System Administrators and Support Engineers and the remaining tetralogy books Windows Crash Dump Analysis and Advanced Windows Crash Dump Analysis.
Product information:
Fromt cover:

Table of Contents to be published soon.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
The book is about to be submitted for publication. It has 68 full color illustrations. Here is TOC:
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Module Variety pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Memory Dump Analysis Anthology lacks full color inserts. This is rather a current limitation of POD technology that OpenTask publisher uses at the present time. The solution previously announced a year ago is to print a separate full color title with selected articles and illustrations. Finally, it is about to be published next month. The book front and back covers are collages from covers of individual memory dump analysis volumes:


TOC will be available soon. Here is the book data:
OpenTask also plans a separate color supplement for volumes 4 and 5 once they are published.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Spiking Thread pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
A print spooler service process was hanging and blocking print-related requests from other coupled processes. Default analysis of its dump doesn’t show any problem (it shows normal service main thread):
0:000> !analyze -v
EXCEPTION_RECORD: ffffffff -- (.exr 0xffffffffffffffff)
ExceptionAddress: 00000000
ExceptionCode: 80000003 (Break instruction exception)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 0
BUGCHECK_STR: APPLICATION_FAULT_STATUS_BREAKPOINT
STACK_TEXT:
0006fbcc 7c82776b 77e418b2 00000064 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
0006fbd0 77e418b2 00000064 00000000 00000000 ntdll!NtReadFile+0xc
0006fc38 77f65edb 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a kernel32!ReadFile+0x16c
0006fc64 77f65f82 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a advapi32!ScGetPipeInput+0x2a
0006fcd8 77f51ed9 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a advapi32!ScDispatcherLoop+0x51
0006ff3c 01004019 0100d5bc 010047a2 00000001 advapi32!StartServiceCtrlDispatcherW+0xe3
0006ff44 010047a2 00000001 00263fa0 00262be0 spoolsv!main+0xb
0006ffc0 77e6f23b 00000000 00000000 7ffd7000 spoolsv!mainCRTStartup+0x12f
0006fff0 00000000 0100468c 00000000 78746341 kernel32!BaseProcessStart+0x23
0:000> !analyze -v -hang
EXCEPTION_RECORD: ffffffff -- (.exr 0xffffffffffffffff)
ExceptionAddress: 00000000
ExceptionCode: 80000003 (Break instruction exception)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 0
BUGCHECK_STR: HANG
STACK_TEXT:
0006fbcc 7c82776b 77e418b2 00000064 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
0006fbd0 77e418b2 00000064 00000000 00000000 ntdll!NtReadFile+0xc
0006fc38 77f65edb 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a kernel32!ReadFile+0x16c
0006fc64 77f65f82 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a advapi32!ScGetPipeInput+0x2a
0006fcd8 77f51ed9 00000064 0006fd04 0000021a advapi32!ScDispatcherLoop+0x51
0006ff3c 01004019 0100d5bc 010047a2 00000001 advapi32!StartServiceCtrlDispatcherW+0xe3
0006ff44 010047a2 00000001 00263fa0 00262be0 spoolsv!main+0xb
0006ffc0 77e6f23b 00000000 00000000 7ffd7000 spoolsv!mainCRTStartup+0x12f
0006fff0 00000000 0100468c 00000000 78746341 kernel32!BaseProcessStart+0x23
Stack trace collection shows several threads waiting for a critical section when allocating heap blocks or calling loader functions, for example:
0:000> ~*k
[...]
20 Id: 540.71d0 Suspend: 1 Teb: 7ffa2000 Unfrozen
ChildEBP RetAddr
0597fa20 7c827d0b ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
0597fa24 7c83d236 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc
0597fa60 7c83d281 ntdll!RtlpWaitOnCriticalSection+0×1a3
0597fa80 7c82a264 ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0xa8
0597fca8 77c7e5cf ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×313
0597fcbc 77c7e5a6 rpcrt4!AllocWrapper+0×1e
0597fcc8 77c82069 rpcrt4!operator new+0xd
0597fdf4 77c812a5 rpcrt4!LRPC_SCALL::LrpcMessageToRpcMessage+0xd0
0597fe20 77c88678 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::DealWithLRPCRequest+0×66
0597ff84 77c88792 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0×430
0597ff8c 77c8872d rpcrt4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0xd
0597ffac 77c7b110 rpcrt4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0×9d
0597ffb8 77e64829 rpcrt4!ThreadStartRoutine+0×1b
0597ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0×34
21 Id: 540.5b3c Suspend: 1 Teb: 7ff9f000 Unfrozen
ChildEBP RetAddr
090dfea0 7c827d0b ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
090dfea4 7c83d236 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc
090dfee0 7c83d281 ntdll!RtlpWaitOnCriticalSection+0×1a3
090dff00 7c81909b ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0xa8
090dffa8 77e4f920 ntdll!LdrShutdownThread+0×33
090dffb8 77e6482e kernel32!ExitThread+0×2f
090dffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0×39
[...]
!cs command shows wait chains and signs of critical section corruption. Here is the commented output:
0:000> !cs -l -o -s
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x7c8877c0
Critical section = 0×7c8877a0 (ntdll!LdrpLoaderLock+0×0)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0×5
WaiterWoken = No
OwningThread = 0×00005a20
RecursionCount = 0×1
LockSemaphore = 0×184
SpinCount = 0×00000000
OwningThread DbgId = ~25s
OwningThread Stack =
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
0568f42c 7c827d0b 7c83d236 00000da0 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
0568f430 7c83d236 00000da0 00000000 00000000 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc
0568f46c 7c83d281 00000da0 00000004 00080000 ntdll!RtlpWaitOnCriticalSection+0×1a3
0568f48c 7c82a264 00080608 7c82e6b4 0000008e ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0xa8
0568f6b4 77e6427d 00080000 00000000 00000594 ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×313
0568f718 77e643a2 77e643d0 00020abc 00000000 kernel32!BasepComputeProcessPath+0xc2
0568f758 77e65348 00000000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!BaseComputeProcessDllPath+0xe3
0568f79c 77e6528f 0568f7b8 00000000 4dc5822c kernel32!GetModuleHandleForUnicodeString+0×2b
0568fc14 77e65155 00000001 00000002 0568fc38 kernel32!BasepGetModuleHandleExW+0×17f
0568fc2c 4dc4d554 0568fc38 003a0043 0057005c kernel32!GetModuleHandleW+0×29
0568fe4c 4dc49a0a 4dc32328 00000001 0568fe80 MSCTFIME!GetSystemModuleHandleW+0×40
0568fe5c 4dc49bc3 4dc5822c 4dc32328 4dc32380 MSCTFIME!GetFn+0×2e
0568fe74 4dc49039 00000003 0568fea0 4dc49fbb MSCTFIME!TF_DllDetachInOther+0×2a
0568fe80 4dc49fbb 4dc30000 00000003 00000000 MSCTFIME!DllMain+0×1d
0568fea0 7c81a352 4dc30000 00000003 00000000 MSCTFIME!_DllMainCRTStartup+0×52
0568fec0 7c819178 4dc49f69 4dc30000 00000003 ntdll!LdrpCallInitRoutine+0×14
0568ff74 77e4f920 3533e0ec 00000000 0568ff98 ntdll!LdrShutdownThread+0xd2
0568ff84 77e52868 00000000 3533e0ec 77e5bf51 kernel32!ExitThread+0×2f
0568ff98 3530cd31 35100000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!FreeLibraryAndExitThread+0×40
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
0568ffb8 77e64829 00001430 00000000 00000000 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×1dcdb1
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
The thread #25 is blocked waiting for the critical section 00080608 but it also owns another critical section LdrpLoaderLock and blocks 5 other threads. Stack trace features PrintDriverA module.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x7c887be0
Critical section = 0×7c887740 (ntdll!FastPebLock+0×0)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0×0
WaiterWoken = No
OwningThread = 0×00005a20
RecursionCount = 0×1
LockSemaphore = 0×868
SpinCount = 0×00000000
OwningThread DbgId = ~25s
OwningThread Stack =
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
0568f42c 7c827d0b 7c83d236 00000da0 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
0568f430 7c83d236 00000da0 00000000 00000000 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc
0568f46c 7c83d281 00000da0 00000004 00080000 ntdll!RtlpWaitOnCriticalSection+0×1a3
0568f48c 7c82a264 00080608 7c82e6b4 0000008e ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0xa8
0568f6b4 77e6427d 00080000 00000000 00000594 ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×313
0568f718 77e643a2 77e643d0 00020abc 00000000 kernel32!BasepComputeProcessPath+0xc2
0568f758 77e65348 00000000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!BaseComputeProcessDllPath+0xe3
0568f79c 77e6528f 0568f7b8 00000000 4dc5822c kernel32!GetModuleHandleForUnicodeString+0×2b
0568fc14 77e65155 00000001 00000002 0568fc38 kernel32!BasepGetModuleHandleExW+0×17f
0568fc2c 4dc4d554 0568fc38 003a0043 0057005c kernel32!GetModuleHandleW+0×29
0568fe4c 4dc49a0a 4dc32328 00000001 0568fe80 MSCTFIME!GetSystemModuleHandleW+0×40
0568fe5c 4dc49bc3 4dc5822c 4dc32328 4dc32380 MSCTFIME!GetFn+0×2e
0568fe74 4dc49039 00000003 0568fea0 4dc49fbb MSCTFIME!TF_DllDetachInOther+0×2a
0568fe80 4dc49fbb 4dc30000 00000003 00000000 MSCTFIME!DllMain+0×1d
0568fea0 7c81a352 4dc30000 00000003 00000000 MSCTFIME!_DllMainCRTStartup+0×52
0568fec0 7c819178 4dc49f69 4dc30000 00000003 ntdll!LdrpCallInitRoutine+0×14
0568ff74 77e4f920 3533e0ec 00000000 0568ff98 ntdll!LdrShutdownThread+0xd2
0568ff84 77e52868 00000000 3533e0ec 77e5bf51 kernel32!ExitThread+0×2f
0568ff98 3530cd31 35100000 00000000 00000000 kernel32!FreeLibraryAndExitThread+0×40
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
0568ffb8 77e64829 00001430 00000000 00000000 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×1dcdb1
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
This is the same thread #25 but it also owns another critical section FastPebLock but this doesn’t block additional threads.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x7c887c80
Critical section = 0×00080608 (+0×80608)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0×4
WaiterWoken = No
OwningThread = 0×0000a8c4
RecursionCount = 0×1
LockSemaphore = 0xDA0
SpinCount = 0×00000fa0
OwningThread DbgId = ~22s
OwningThread Stack =
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
03456830 7739bf53 7739610a 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
03456868 7738965e 186403ba 00000000 00000001 user32!NtUserWaitMessage+0xc
03456890 7739f762 77380000 05bdc880 00000000 user32!InternalDialogBox+0xd0
03456b50 7739f047 03456cac 00000000 ffffffff user32!SoftModalMessageBox+0×94b
03456ca0 7739eec9 03456cac 00000028 00000000 user32!MessageBoxWorker+0×2ba
03456cf8 773d7d0d 00000000 0ae7cc20 02639ea8 user32!MessageBoxTimeoutW+0×7a
03456d80 773c42c8 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxTimeoutA+0×9c
03456da0 773c42a4 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxExA+0×1b
03456dbc 6dfcf8c2 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxA+0×45
034575f8 6dfd05cf 03456e5a 03457624 77bc6cd5 compstui!FilterException+0×174
03458584 6dfcff1e 02638dc8 00000000 03458c58 compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0×110
034587f0 6dfd00a2 02638b40 026393f8 00000000 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458848 7307c9ae 43440001 00000005 02118690 compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458870 6dfd059a 0345888c 03458c58 7307c8da winspool!DevicePropertySheets+0xd4
034588d4 6dfcff1e 026393f8 00000000 03458c58 compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0xdb
03458b40 6dfd00a2 02638b40 02638b40 00000000 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458b98 6dfd06a3 43440000 00000005 7307c8da compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458bcc 6dfd0799 00000000 7307c8da 03458c58 compstui!DoCommonPropertySheetUI+0×74
03458be4 730801c5 00000000 7307c8da 03458c58 compstui!CommonPropertySheetUIW+0×17
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
The thread #22 is blocked waiting for the message box but it also owns the critical section 00080608 we have seen above and the thread blocks 4 other threads.
Cannot read structure field value at 0x04ddbb64, error 0
Cannot determine if the critical section is locked or not.
-----------------------------------------
Critical section = 0x04ddbb60 (+0x4DDBB60)
DebugInfo = 0x01e10858
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24d38
Critical section = 0x0589de08 (PrintDriverB+0×49DE8)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0xC5D3FFF
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0×00008487
RecursionCount = 0×8DD5FF50
LockSemaphore = 0×50CE8B00
SpinCount = 0×878dd5ff
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x0080878d doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24d38.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24c98
Critical section = 0x0589ddd8 (PrintDriverB+0x49DB8)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0x1D38F6EE
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0x1c2444db
RecursionCount = 0xD3FF50CE
LockSemaphore = 0x8D04EC83
SpinCount = 0x1cd9744f
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x8dffff73 doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24c98.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
Cannot read structure field value at 0x8dffff75, error 0
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24f40
Critical section = 0x0589de28 (PrintDriverB+0x49E08)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0x1D38F6EE
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0x1c2444db
RecursionCount = 0xD3FF50CE
LockSemaphore = 0x8D04EC83
SpinCount = 0x00008c8f
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x8d242454 doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24f40.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
Cannot read structure field value at 0x8d242456, error 0
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24d10
Critical section = 0x0589de08 (PrintDriverB+0x49DE8)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0xC5D3FFF
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0x00008487
RecursionCount = 0x8DD5FF50
LockSemaphore = 0x50CE8B00
SpinCount = 0x878dd5ff
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x0080878d doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24d10.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24ec8
Critical section = 0x0589de28 (PrintDriverB+0x49E08)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0x1D38F6EE
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0x1c2444db
RecursionCount = 0xD3FF50CE
LockSemaphore = 0x8D04EC83
SpinCount = 0x00008c8f
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x8d242454 doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24ec8.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
Cannot read structure field value at 0x8d242456, error 0
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
-----------------------------------------
DebugInfo = 0x05b24cc0
Critical section = 0x0589ddd8 (PrintDriverB+0x49DB8)
LOCKED
LockCount = 0x1D38F6EE
WaiterWoken = Yes
OwningThread = 0x1c2444db
RecursionCount = 0xD3FF50CE
LockSemaphore = 0x8D04EC83
SpinCount = 0x1cd9744f
WARNING: critical section DebugInfo = 0x8dffff73 doesn't point back
to the DebugInfo found in the active critical sections list = 0x05b24cc0.
The critical section was probably reused without calling DeleteCriticalSection.
Cannot read structure field value at 0x8dffff75, error 0
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
ntdll!RtlpStackTraceDataBase is NULL. Probably the stack traces are not enabled.
Here we see the recurrence of PrintDriverB module in the output that looks like corruption. Because the thread #22 heads the wait chain we look at its full stack trace:
0:000> ~22s; kL 100
eax=00465758 ebx=00000000 ecx=00467514 edx=00000001 esi=00467500 edi=00000000
eip=7c8285ec esp=03456834 ebp=03456868 iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000246
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet:
7c8285ec c3 ret
ChildEBP RetAddr
03456830 7739bf53 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
03456868 7738965e user32!NtUserWaitMessage+0xc
03456890 7739f762 user32!InternalDialogBox+0xd0
03456b50 7739f047 user32!SoftModalMessageBox+0x94b
03456ca0 7739eec9 user32!MessageBoxWorker+0x2ba
03456cf8 773d7d0d user32!MessageBoxTimeoutW+0x7a
03456d80 773c42c8 user32!MessageBoxTimeoutA+0x9c
03456da0 773c42a4 user32!MessageBoxExA+0x1b
03456dbc 6dfcf8c2 user32!MessageBoxA+0×45
034575f8 6dfd05cf compstui!FilterException+0×174
03458584 6dfcff1e compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0×110
034587f0 6dfd00a2 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458848 7307c9ae compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458870 6dfd059a winspool!DevicePropertySheets+0xd4
034588d4 6dfcff1e compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0xdb
03458b40 6dfd00a2 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458b98 6dfd06a3 compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458bcc 6dfd0799 compstui!DoCommonPropertySheetUI+0×74
03458be4 730801c5 compstui!CommonPropertySheetUIW+0×17
03458c2c 73080f5d winspool!CallCommonPropertySheetUI+0×43
03459074 35145947 winspool!PrinterPropertiesNative+0×10c
034590c4 3513a045 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×159c7
0345e9ac 35131819 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0xa0c5
0345ebdc 32020661 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×1899
0345ec04 3201b171 PS5UI!HComOEMPrinterEvent+0×33
0345ec48 02117a79 PS5UI!DrvPrinterEvent+0×239
0345eea4 7308218c PrintDriverA!DrvPrinterEvent+0xf9
0345eef0 761542cc winspool!SpoolerPrinterEventNative+0×57
0345ef0c 76155fd6 localspl!SplDriverEvent+0×21
0345ef30 76144799 localspl!PrinterDriverEvent+0×46
0345f3f8 76144ab2 localspl!SplAddPrinter+0×5f3
0345f424 74070193 localspl!LocalAddPrinterEx+0×2e
0345f874 7407025c spoolss!AddPrinterExW+0×151
0345f890 0100792d spoolss!AddPrinterW+0×17
0345f8ac 01006762 spoolsv!YAddPrinter+0×75
0345f8d0 77c80193 spoolsv!RpcAddPrinter+0×37
0345f8f8 77ce33e1 rpcrt4!Invoke+0×30
0345fcf8 77ce35c4 rpcrt4!NdrStubCall2+0×299
0345fd14 77c7ff7a rpcrt4!NdrServerCall2+0×19
0345fd48 77c8042d rpcrt4!DispatchToStubInCNoAvrf+0×38
0345fd9c 77c80353 rpcrt4!RPC_INTERFACE::DispatchToStubWorker+0×11f
0345fdc0 77c811dc rpcrt4!RPC_INTERFACE::DispatchToStub+0xa3
0345fdfc 77c812f0 rpcrt4!LRPC_SCALL::DealWithRequestMessage+0×42c
0345fe20 77c88678 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::DealWithLRPCRequest+0×127
0345ff84 77c88792 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0×430
0345ff8c 77c8872d rpcrt4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0xd
0345ffac 77c7b110 rpcrt4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0×9d
0345ffb8 77e64829 rpcrt4!ThreadStartRoutine+0×1b
0345ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0×34
There is PrintDriverA module on the stack trace. Notice that we also have FilterException function on the stack trace. It raises the suspicion bar. We proceed to examining MessageBoxA parameters:
0:022> kv 100
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
03456830 7739bf53 7739610a 00000000 00000000 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
03456868 7738965e 186403ba 00000000 00000001 user32!NtUserWaitMessage+0xc
03456890 7739f762 77380000 05bdc880 00000000 user32!InternalDialogBox+0xd0
03456b50 7739f047 03456cac 00000000 ffffffff user32!SoftModalMessageBox+0x94b
03456ca0 7739eec9 03456cac 00000028 00000000 user32!MessageBoxWorker+0x2ba
03456cf8 773d7d0d 00000000 0ae7cc20 02639ea8 user32!MessageBoxTimeoutW+0x7a
03456d80 773c42c8 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxTimeoutA+0x9c
03456da0 773c42a4 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxExA+0x1b
03456dbc 6dfcf8c2 00000000 03456e14 03456df4 user32!MessageBoxA+0×45
034575f8 6dfd05cf 03456e5a 03457624 77bc6cd5 compstui!FilterException+0×174
[…]
0:022> da /c 90 03456e14
03456e14 “Function address 0×7c8100ca caused a protection fault. (exception code 0xc0000005). Some or all property page(s) may not be displayed.”
There was an exception indeed diagnosed by FilterException call. The exception is probably hidden somewhere on the raw stack:
0:022> !teb
TEB at 7ffde000
ExceptionList: 03456d40
StackBase: 03460000
StackLimit: 03450000
SubSystemTib: 00000000
FiberData: 00001e00
ArbitraryUserPointer: 00000000
Self: 7ffde000
EnvironmentPointer: 00000000
ClientId: 00000540 . 0000a8c4
RpcHandle: 00000000
Tls Storage: 00000000
PEB Address: 7ffd7000
LastErrorValue: 0
LastStatusValue: c0000022
Count Owned Locks: 0
HardErrorMode: 0
0:022> dds 03450000 03460000
03450000 00000000
03450004 00000000
03450008 00000000
0345000c 00000000
[...]
03457674 03458574
03457678 7c8315c2 ntdll!RtlDispatchException+0×91
0345767c 03457710
03457680 03458574
03457684 0345772c
03457688 034576ec
0345768c 6dfd0a54 compstui!_except_handler3
03457690 00080000
03457694 03457710
03457698 0269b640
0345769c 026afc38
034576a0 00080000
034576a4 00080000
034576a8 026afc38
034576ac 026b2008
034576b0 034576cc
034576b4 7c82a771 ntdll!RtlpCoalesceFreeBlocks+0×383
034576b8 00000249
034576bc 026b2008
034576c0 00080000
034576c4 026afc38
034576c8 00080000
034576cc 00000000
034576d0 00080000
034576d4 034577b4
034576d8 7c82a90a ntdll!RtlFreeHeap+0×6b0
034576dc 00080608
034576e0 7c829f59 ntdll!RtlFreeHeap+0×70f
034576e4 03457870
034576e8 00000000
034576ec 00000001
034576f0 03460000
034576f4 006afc38
034576f8 03457c14
034576fc 7c82855e ntdll!KiUserExceptionDispatcher+0xe
03457700 03450000
03457704 0345772c
03457708 03457710
0345770c 0345772c
03457710 c0000005
03457714 00000000
03457718 00000000
0345771c 7c8100ca ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×7b3
03457720 00000002
03457724 00000001
03457728 026c663c
0345772c 0001003f
03457730 00000000
03457734 00000000
03457738 00000000
0345773c 00000000
03457740 00000000
03457744 00000000
03457748 ffff027f
0345774c ffff0000
[…]
It finally looks like a heap corruption:
0:022> .cxr 0345772c
eax=00000b28 ebx=00005e69 ecx=026c663c edx=0269b648 esi=0269b640 edi=00080000
eip=7c8100ca esp=034579f8 ebp=03457c14 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz ac pe nc
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00010216
ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×7b3:
7c8100ca 8901 mov dword ptr [ecx],eax ds:0023:026c663c=????????
0:022> kL 100
ChildEBP RetAddr
03457c14 77c0b66f ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0×7b3
03457c44 77c1581a gdi32!EnumFontsInternalW+0×63
03457c68 32014246 gdi32!EnumFontFamiliesW+0×1c
03457ce4 32019ab4 PS5UI!BPackItemFontSubstTable+0×95
03457cf4 32014a0f PS5UI!BPackPrinterPropertyItems+0×19
03457d0c 32019e2b PS5UI!PPrepareDataForCommonUI+0×1af
0345813c 02118a57 PS5UI!DrvDevicePropertySheets+0×1dc
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
03458520 6dfd059a PrintDriverA!DrvDevicePropertySheets+0×3c7
03458584 6dfcff1e compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0xdb
034587f0 6dfd00a2 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458848 7307c9ae compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458870 6dfd059a winspool!DevicePropertySheets+0xd4
034588d4 6dfcff1e compstui!CallpfnPSUI+0xdb
03458b40 6dfd00a2 compstui!InsertPSUIPage+0×201
03458b98 6dfd06a3 compstui!CPSUICallBack+0xed
03458bcc 6dfd0799 compstui!DoCommonPropertySheetUI+0×74
03458be4 730801c5 compstui!CommonPropertySheetUIW+0×17
03458c2c 73080f5d winspool!CallCommonPropertySheetUI+0×43
03459074 35145947 winspool!PrinterPropertiesNative+0×10c
034590c4 3513a045 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×159c7
0345e9ac 35131819 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0xa0c5
0345ebdc 32020661 PrintDriverA!DllGetClassObject+0×1899
0345ec04 3201b171 PS5UI!HComOEMPrinterEvent+0×33
0345ec48 02117a79 PS5UI!DrvPrinterEvent+0×239
0345eea4 7308218c PrintDriverA!DrvPrinterEvent+0xf9
0345eef0 761542cc winspool!SpoolerPrinterEventNative+0×57
0345ef0c 76155fd6 localspl!SplDriverEvent+0×21
0345ef30 76144799 localspl!PrinterDriverEvent+0×46
0345f3f8 76144ab2 localspl!SplAddPrinter+0×5f3
0345f424 74070193 localspl!LocalAddPrinterEx+0×2e
0345f874 7407025c spoolss!AddPrinterExW+0×151
0345f890 0100792d spoolss!AddPrinterW+0×17
0345f8ac 01006762 spoolsv!YAddPrinter+0×75
0345f8d0 77c80193 spoolsv!RpcAddPrinter+0×37
0345f8f8 77ce33e1 rpcrt4!Invoke+0×30
0345fcf8 77ce35c4 rpcrt4!NdrStubCall2+0×299
0345fd14 77c7ff7a rpcrt4!NdrServerCall2+0×19
0345fd48 77c8042d rpcrt4!DispatchToStubInCNoAvrf+0×38
0345fd9c 77c80353 rpcrt4!RPC_INTERFACE::DispatchToStubWorker+0×11f
0345fdc0 77c811dc rpcrt4!RPC_INTERFACE::DispatchToStub+0xa3
0345fdfc 77c812f0 rpcrt4!LRPC_SCALL::DealWithRequestMessage+0×42c
0345fe20 77c88678 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::DealWithLRPCRequest+0×127
0345ff84 77c88792 rpcrt4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0×430
0345ff8c 77c8872d rpcrt4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0xd
0345ffac 77c7b110 rpcrt4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0×9d
0345ffb8 77e64829 rpcrt4!ThreadStartRoutine+0×1b
0345ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0×34
lmt command shows many loaded print drivers but we advise the fans of driver elimination to remove or upgrade PrintDriverB and PrintDriveA. We also advise to enable full page heap on the spooler service to find the direct offender.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
One common question is to how determine a service name from kernel memory dump where PEB information is not available (!peb). For example, there are plenty of svchost.exe processes running and one has a handle leak. I’m looking for a good simple method and in the mean time I suggested to use the following empirical data:
1. Look at driver modules on stack traces (e.g. termdd)
2. Look at the relative position of svchost.exe in the list of processes that reflects service startup dependency (!process 0 0)
3. Execution residue and string pointers on thread raw stacks (WinDbg script)
4. Process handle table (usually available for the current process according to my experience)
5. The number of threads and distribution of modules on thread stack traces (might require reference stack traces)
6. IRP information (e.g. a driver, device and file objects), for example:
THREAD fffffa800c21fbb0 Cid 0264.4ba4 Teb: 000007fffff92000 Win32Thread: fffff900c2001d50 WAIT: (WrQueue) UserMode Alertable
fffffa800673f330 QueueObject
IRP List:
fffffa800c388010: (0006,0478) Flags: 00060070 Mdl: 00000000
Not impersonating
DeviceMap fffff88000006160
Owning Process fffffa8006796c10 Image: svchost.exe
Attached Process N/A Image: N/A
Wait Start TickCount 30553196 Ticks: 1359 (0:00:00:21.200)
Context Switch Count 175424 LargeStack
UserTime 00:00:05.834
KernelTime 00:00:32.541
Win32 Start Address 0x0000000077a77cb0
Stack Init fffffa60154c6db0 Current fffffa60154c6820
Base fffffa60154c7000 Limit fffffa60154bf000 Call 0
Priority 10 BasePriority 8 PriorityDecrement 0 IoPriority 2 PagePriority 5
Child-SP RetAddr Call Site
fffffa60`154c6860 fffff800`01ab20fa nt!KiSwapContext+0x7f
fffffa60`154c69a0 fffff800`01ab55a4 nt!KiSwapThread+0x13a
fffffa60`154c6a10 fffff800`01d17427 nt!KeRemoveQueueEx+0x4b4
fffffa60`154c6ac0 fffff800`01ae465b nt!IoRemoveIoCompletion+0x47
fffffa60`154c6b40 fffff800`01aaf933 nt!NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory+0x1fe
fffffa60`154c6c20 00000000`77aa857a nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13 (TrapFrame @ fffffa60`154c6c20)
00000000`04e7fb58 00000000`00000000 0x77aa857a
3: kd> !irp fffffa800c388010
Irp is active with 6 stacks 6 is current (= 0xfffffa800c388248)
No Mdl: System buffer=fffffa800871b210: Thread fffffa800c21fbb0: Irp stack trace.
cmd flg cl Device File Completion-Context
[ 0, 0] 0 0 00000000 00000000 00000000-00000000
Args: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 0, 0] 0 0 00000000 00000000 00000000-00000000
Args: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 0, 0] 0 0 00000000 00000000 00000000-00000000
Args: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 0, 0] 0 0 00000000 00000000 00000000-00000000
Args: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[ 0, 0] 0 0 00000000 00000000 00000000-00000000
Args: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>[ e, 0] 5 1 fffffa8006018060 fffffa8007bf0e60 00000000-00000000 pending
\Driver\rdpdr
Args: 00000100 00000000 00090004 00000000
3: kd> !fileobj fffffa8007bf0e60
\TSCLIENT\SCARD\14
Device Object: 0xfffffa8006018060 \Driver\rdpdr
Vpb is NULL
Access: Read Write SharedRead SharedWrite
Flags: 0x44000
Cleanup Complete
Handle Created
FsContext: 0xfffff8801807c010 FsContext2: 0xfffff8801807c370
CurrentByteOffset: 0
Cache Data:
Section Object Pointers: fffffa800c50fdc8
Shared Cache Map: 00000000
Any other ideas are appreciated. Please comment.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
I’ve decided to adapt archaeological classificatory framework (using my favourite method of inquiry: metaphorical bijectionism) to lay out foundations for yet another attempt to classify DA+TA patterns):
Attribute ↔ Pattern 2
Artefact ↔ Component Artefact1
Assemblage ↔ Component Assemblage
Culture ↔ Memory System Culture

1 Can be either a component-generated artefact or a component like a module or symbol file
2 Typical examples of memory system cultures are Windows, UNIX or even “Multiplatform”
I propose a word Memoarchaeological for such a framework and Memoarchaeology for a branch of Memoretics that studies saved computer memory artifacts from past computations (as opposed to live memory).
Note: In one of the forthcoming issues of Debugged! MZ/PE magazine there will be presented yet another classificatory scheme.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Insufficient Memory (control blocks) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Forthcoming CARE and STARE online systems additionally aim to provide software behaviour pattern identification via debugger log and trace analysis and suggest possible software troubleshooting patterns. The purpose of these post series is to provide high level overview of possible patterns of software behavior and how they can be recognised and analyzed. This work started in October, 2006 with the identification of computer memory patterns and later continued with software trace patterns. Bringing all of them under a unified linked framework seems quite natural to me.
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -
Today we introduce an icon for Insufficient Memory (physical memory) pattern:
B/W
![]()
Color
![]()
- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org + TraceAnalysis.org -