Crash Dump Analysis AntiPatterns (Part 5)

Sponsored link: Memory Dump Analysis Services

Debugging Experts Magazine Online

Fooled by Description or the first incursion into Psychology of Memory Dump Analysis 

From my observation an engineer with software development background opens a crash dump after glancing at a problem description provided by a customer or even without reading it first. Only if the problem is not immediately obvious from the memory dump file the engineer will read the problem description thoroughly. On the contrary, an engineer with technical support or system administration background will thoroughly read the problem description first. In the latter case the description might influence the direction of analysis.

Here is an example. The description says - slow application start and you have a memory dump from a process. An engineer with technical support background will most likely look for hang patterns inside the dump. An engineer with experience writing native applications in C and C++ will open the dump and check an exception stored in it and if it is a breakpoint the suspicion might arise that the memory dump was taken manually because of the hanging process. Based on analysis the engineer might even correct the problem description or add questions that clarify the discrepancy between what is seen in the dump and what users perceive.

- Dmitry Vostokov @ DumpAnalysis.org -

           

Museum of Debugging and Memory Dumps

7/7/2010 - 8/8/2010 Annual Competition: Tell Your Windows Debugging Story

Crash and Hang Analysis Audit Service

CARE: Crash Analysis Report Environment

Crash Dump and Software Trace Analysis Training and Seminars

Access OpenTask Titles on Safari Books Online

DATA (Dump Analysis + Trace Analysis) Facebook group
Please join the community of memory (dump) and trace analysis engineers. This group promotes scientific methods and memory dump-based worldview.

Twitter @ DumpAnalysis
You can now follow portal and blog news at DumpAnalysis on Twitter

LinkedIn Group Dr. Watson Enthusiasts
All about Dr. Watson errors and more. Get news, excerpts and progress reports about the forthcoming book The Science of Dr. Watson: An Illustrated History of Debugging (ISBN 978-1906717070)

2010 (0x7DA) - The Year of Dump Analysis
2011 (0x7DB) - 2020 (0x7E4) The Debugging Decade

International Memory Analysts and Debuggers Day:
07.07 and/or 08.08 starting from The Year of Dump Analysis, 2010, 7DA

Announcements

Coming Soon:

Management Bits: An Anthology from Reductionist Manager

Crash Dump Analysis: Practical Foundations (Windows Edition, Systematic Software Fault Analysis Series)

Debugging Notebook: Essential Concepts, WinDbg Commands and Tools

Crash Dump Analysis for System Administrators and Support Engineers

New Magazines:

Debugged! MZ/PE: MagaZine for/from Practicing Engineers


New Books:

Memory Dump Analysis Anthology: Color Supplement for Volumes 1-3

Memory Dump Analysis Anthology, Volume 3

First Fault Software Problem Solving: A Guide for Engineers, Managers and Users

x64 Windows Debugging: Practical Foundations

Also available:

Windows Debugging: Practical Foundations

DLL List Landscape: The Art from Computer Memory Space

Dumps, Bugs and Debugging Forensics: The Adventures of Dr. Debugalov

WinDbg: A Reference Poster and Learning Cards

Memory Dump Analysis Anthology, Volume 2

Memory Dump Analysis Anthology, Volume 1

New Children's Book:

Baby Turing

One Response to “Crash Dump Analysis AntiPatterns (Part 5)”

  1. TomM Says:

    A antipattern not is only relevant to dump analysis but to troubleshooting in general.

    The best approach would be to take the benefits from both worlds where you thoroughly read the problem description but also be careful not to jump to assumptions. In this case the unverified assumption is that the dump is off a hung process and a manually triggered crash dump.

Leave a Reply