Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 96)

For certain stack traces we should always be aware of Coincidental Frames similar to Coincidental Symbolic Information pattern for raw stack data. Such frames can lead to a wrong analysis conclusion. Consider this stack trace fragment from a kernel memory dump:

0: kd> kL 100
ChildEBP RetAddr
9c5b6550 8082d9a4 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0×1b
9c5b6914 8088befa nt!KiDispatchException+0×3a2
9c5b697c 8088beae nt!CommonDispatchException+0×4a
9c5b699c 80a6056d nt!KiExceptionExit+0×186
9c5b69a0 80893ae2 hal!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock+0×2d
9c5b6a08 b20c3de5 nt!MiFreePoolPages+0×7dc
WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong.
9c5b6a48 b20c4107 DeriverA+0×17de5

The frame with MiFreePoolPages symbol might suggest some sort of a pool corruption. We can even double check return addresses and see the valid common sense assembly language code:

0: kd> ub 8088beae
8088be8f 33c9            xor     ecx,ecx
8088be91 e81a000000      call    nt!CommonDispatchException (8088beb0)
8088be96 33d2            xor     edx,edx
8088be98 b901000000      mov     ecx,1
8088be9d e80e000000      call    nt!CommonDispatchException (8088beb0)
8088bea2 33d2            xor     edx,edx
8088bea4 b902000000      mov     ecx,2
8088bea9 e802000000      call    nt!CommonDispatchException (8088beb0)

0: kd> ub 80a6056d
80a6055b 7511            jne     hal!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock+0×2e (80a6056e)
80a6055d 50              push    eax
80a6055e f00fb119        lock cmpxchg dword ptr [ecx],ebx
80a60562 58              pop     eax
80a60563 7512            jne     hal!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock+0×37 (80a60577)
80a60565 5b              pop     ebx
80a60566 8aca            mov     cl,dl
80a60568 e8871e0000      call    hal!KfLowerIrql (80a623f4)

0: kd> ub 80893ae2
80893ac9 761c            jbe     nt!MiFreePoolPages+0×7e1 (80893ae7)
80893acb ff75f8          push    dword ptr [ebp-8]
80893ace ff7508          push    dword ptr [ebp+8]
80893ad1 e87ea1fcff      call    nt!MiFreeNonPagedPool (8085dc54)
80893ad6 8a55ff          mov     dl,byte ptr [ebp-1]
80893ad9 6a0f            push    0Fh
80893adb 59              pop     ecx
80893adc ff1524118080    call    dword ptr [nt!_imp_KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock (80801124)]

0: kd> ub b20c3de5
b20c3dcf 51              push    ecx
b20c3dd0 ff5010          call    dword ptr [eax+10h]
b20c3dd3 eb10            jmp     DriverA+0×17de5 (b20c3de5)
b20c3dd5 8b5508          mov     edx,dword ptr [ebp+8]
b20c3dd8 52              push    edx
b20c3dd9 8d86a0000000    lea     eax,[esi+0A0h]
b20c3ddf 50              push    eax
b20c3de0 e8ebf1ffff      call    DriverA+0×16fd0 (b20c2fd0)

However, if we try to reconstruct the stack trace manually we would naturally skip these 3 frames (shown in magenta):

9c5b6550 8082d9a4 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1b
9c5b6914 8088befa nt!KiDispatchException+0x3a2
9c5b697c 8088beae nt!CommonDispatchException+0x4a
9c5b699c 80a6056d nt!KiExceptionExit+0×186
9c5b69a0 80893ae2 hal!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock+0×2d
9c5b6a08 b20c3de5 nt!MiFreePoolPages+0×7dc

9c5b6a48 b20c4107 DeriverA+0×17de5

0: kd> !thread
THREAD 8f277020  Cid 081c.7298  Teb: 7ff11000 Win32Thread: 00000000 RUNNING on processor 0
IRP List:
8e234b60: (0006,0094) Flags: 00000000  Mdl: 00000000
Not impersonating
DeviceMap                 e1002880
Owning Process            8fc78b80       Image:         ProcessA.exe
Attached Process          N/A            Image:         N/A
Wait Start TickCount      49046879       Ticks: 0
Context Switch Count      10
UserTime                  00:00:00.000
KernelTime                00:00:00.000
Win32 Start Address DllA!ThreadA (0x7654dc90)
Start Address kernel32!BaseThreadStartThunk (0x77e617dc)
Stack Init 9c5b7000 Current 9c5b6c50 Base 9c5b7000 Limit 9c5b4000 Call 0
Priority 10 BasePriority 10 PriorityDecrement 0
ChildEBP RetAddr  Args to Child

0: kd> dds 9c5b4000 9c5b7000
9c5b4000  00000000
9c5b4004  00000000
9c5b4008  00000000
9c5b6290  ffdff13c
9c5b6294  9c5b6550
9c5b6298  80827e01 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0×1b
9c5b629c  00000008
9c5b62a0  00000286
9c5b654c  00000000
9c5b6550  9c5b6914
9c5b6554  8082d9a4 nt!KiDispatchException+0×3a2
9c5b6558  0000008e
9c5b655c  c0000005
9c5b6910  ffffffff
9c5b6914  9c5b6984
9c5b6918  8088befa nt!CommonDispatchException+0×4a
9c5b691c  9c5b6930
9c5b6920  00000000
9c5b6980  8088beae nt!KiExceptionExit+0×186
9c5b6984  9c5b6a08
9c5b6988  b20c3032 DriverA+0×17032
9c5b698c  badb0d00
9c5b6990  00000006
9c5b6994  8dc11cec
9c5b6998  808b6900 nt!KiTimerTableLock+0×3c0
9c5b699c  9c5b69d4
9c5b69a0  80a6056d hal!KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock+0×2d
9c5b69a4  80893ae2 nt!MiFreePoolPages+0×7dc

9c5b69a8  808b0b40 nt!NonPagedPoolDescriptor
9c5b69ac  03151fd0
9c5b69b0  00000000
9c5b69b4  00000000
9c5b6a04  8f47123b
9c5b6a08  9c5b6a48
9c5b6a0c  b20c3de5 DriverA+0×17de5
9c5b6a10  8e3640a0
9c5b6a14  8f4710d0
9c5b6a44  00000000
9c5b6a48  9c5b6a80
9c5b6a4c  b20c4107 DriverA+0×18107
9c5b6a50  8f4710d0
9c5b6a54  9c5b6a6c

If we try to find a pointer to the exception record we get this crash address:

0: kd> .exr 9c5b6930
ExceptionAddress: b20c3032 (DriverA+0×00017032)
ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
Parameter[0]: 00000000
Parameter[1]: 00000157
Attempt to read from address 00000157

If we disassemble it we see an inlined string or memory copy, perhaps wcscpy function:

0: kd> u b20c3032
b20c3032 f3a5            rep movs dword ptr es:[edi],dword ptr [esi]
b20c3034 8bcb            mov     ecx,ebx
b20c3036 83e103          and     ecx,3
b20c3039 f3a4            rep movs byte ptr es:[edi],byte ptr [esi]
b20c303b 8b750c          mov     esi,dword ptr [ebp+0Ch]
b20c303e 0fb7ca          movzx   ecx,dx
b20c3041 894e14          mov     dword ptr [esi+14h],ecx
b20c3044 8b700c          mov     esi,dword ptr [eax+0Ch]

So the problem happened in DriverA code, not in MiFreePoolPages or KeReleaseQueuedSpinLock.

- Dmitry Vostokov @ + -

One Response to “Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 96)”

  1. Dmitry Vostokov Says:

    This often happens when we have some “boundary” such as in Exception Stack Trace pattern.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.