<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 58)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2012/11/13/trace-analysis-patterns-part-58/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 22:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Skwire</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2012/11/13/trace-analysis-patterns-part-58/#comment-603913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Skwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2012/11/13/trace-analysis-patterns-part-58/#comment-603913</guid>
		<description>Good point, Dmitry! Every process supported by a trace table is limited by when the process starts and ends - tracing the startup and endup of that process requires another process' trace table. Synching the timestamps is important. I haven't seen this point stated anywhere, though it is important and easy to understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Dmitry! Every process supported by a trace table is limited by when the process starts and ends - tracing the startup and endup of that process requires another process&#8217; trace table. Synching the timestamps is important. I haven&#8217;t seen this point stated anywhere, though it is important and easy to understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
