<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WinDbg shortcuts: .opendump</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2010/01/06/windbg-shortcuts-opendump/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taehwa</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2010/01/06/windbg-shortcuts-opendump/#comment-114865</link>
		<dc:creator>Taehwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2010/01/06/windbg-shortcuts-opendump/#comment-114865</guid>
		<description>Wow, Windbg has a lot of commands of which we can't know all.
.opendump is interesting but if I need to analyze mulitple dumps, I'd rather use multiple Windbgs because Windbg can't open new command screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Windbg has a lot of commands of which we can&#8217;t know all.<br />
.opendump is interesting but if I need to analyze mulitple dumps, I&#8217;d rather use multiple Windbgs because Windbg can&#8217;t open new command screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
