<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 9)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 09:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 29)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-185331</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 29)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-185331</guid>
		<description>[...] call this pattern Guest Component and it is a different from Missing Component. Although in the latter pattern a missing component in one trace may appear in another but the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] call this pattern Guest Component and it is a different from Missing Component. Although in the latter pattern a missing component in one trace may appear in another but the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 26)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-174947</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 26)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-174947</guid>
		<description>[...] such traces by their short time duration, missing anchor messages or missing messages from components necessary for analysis. My favourite example is user session initialization in a Citrix terminal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] such traces by their short time duration, missing anchor messages or missing messages from components necessary for analysis. My favourite example is user session initialization in a Citrix terminal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 24)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-155350</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 24)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-155350</guid>
		<description>[...] absence of activity can be seen at a thread level or at a process level where it is similar to Missing Component pattern. The difference from the latter pattern is that we know for certain that we selected our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] absence of activity can be seen at a thread level or at a process level where it is similar to Missing Component pattern. The difference from the latter pattern is that we know for certain that we selected our [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Memory Dumps as Posets</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-87855</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Memory Dumps as Posets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/08/06/trace-analysis-patterns-part-9/#comment-87855</guid>
		<description>[...] (in formation) in the search of isomorphism (or more correctly, general morphism) similar to Missing Component pattern. It is not a coincidence that such pattern pairs can be formed. For example, it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (in formation) in the search of isomorphism (or more correctly, general morphism) similar to Missing Component pattern. It is not a coincidence that such pattern pairs can be formed. For example, it is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
