<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 2)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 13:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Basic facts, periodic error and defamiliarizing effect: software trace pattern cooperation</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-203721</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Basic facts, periodic error and defamiliarizing effect: software trace pattern cooperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-203721</guid>
		<description>[...] help and a software trace was recorded for the offline analysis. First, we checked for Basic Facts and found the correspondence that confirmed the registry key [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] help and a software trace was recorded for the offline analysis. First, we checked for Basic Facts and found the correspondence that confirmed the registry key [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 14)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-116193</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 14)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-116193</guid>
		<description>[...] trace to see how corrdinates of all windows are changed over time. We easily find some Basic Facts in both traces such as window class name or time but it looks like window handle is different. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] trace to see how corrdinates of all windows are changed over time. We easily find some Basic Facts in both traces such as window class name or time but it looks like window handle is different. In [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 4)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-79514</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trace Analysis Patterns (Part 4)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2009/05/07/trace-analysis-patterns-part-2/#comment-79514</guid>
		<description>[...] we see a functional activity in a trace and / or see basic facts. Then we might want find a correlation between that activity or facts in another part of the trace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] we see a functional activity in a trace and / or see basic facts. Then we might want find a correlation between that activity or facts in another part of the trace. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
