<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lateral damage, stack overflow and execution residue: pattern cooperation</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Mental Dumps from June 21st</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-159951</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Old Mental Dumps from June 21st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-159951</guid>
		<description>[...] • Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 16a) - Stack overflow in kernel. Generated some comments and can also be see in the following pattern case study: Lateral damage, stack overflow and execution residue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] • Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 16a) - Stack overflow in kernel. Generated some comments and can also be see in the following pattern case study: Lateral damage, stack overflow and execution residue [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-139574</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-139574</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Have never considered the possibility of being uninitialized. Now I'm thinking about another pattern (if I find other cases)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Have never considered the possibility of being uninitialized. Now I&#8217;m thinking about another pattern (if I find other cases)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OZone</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-139563</link>
		<dc:creator>OZone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-139563</guid>
		<description>Backlink of TSS that you have pointed to was not corrupted. It is just uninitialized. See SS0, ESP0, Flags and LDT - they are valid. So the structure itself is not corrupted. It has never been used instead. On doublefault Windows uses task gate #8 in IDT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backlink of TSS that you have pointed to was not corrupted. It is just uninitialized. See SS0, ESP0, Flags and LDT - they are valid. So the structure itself is not corrupted. It has never been used instead. On doublefault Windows uses task gate #8 in IDT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Bohannon</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-86321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Bohannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/11/05/lateral-damage-stack-overflow-and-execution-residue-pattern-cooperation/#comment-86321</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I was able to extract more information from a customers "corrupted" crash dump with this writeup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I was able to extract more information from a customers &#8220;corrupted&#8221; crash dump with this writeup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
