<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 71)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strong process coupling, stack trace collection, critical section coruption and wait chains, message box, self-diagnosis and hidden exception and dynamic memory corruption: pattern cooperation</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-147469</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strong process coupling, stack trace collection, critical section coruption and wait chains, message box, self-diagnosis and hidden exception and dynamic memory corruption: pattern cooperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-147469</guid>
		<description>[...] command shows wait chains and signs of critical section corruption. Here is the commented [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] command shows wait chains and signs of critical section corruption. Here is the commented [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mystery of Negative LockCount</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-65279</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Mystery of Negative LockCount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-65279</guid>
		<description>[...] Be aware though that negative values could also mean Critical Section Corruption pattern: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Be aware though that negative values could also mean Critical Section Corruption pattern: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can computers debug?</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-37446</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can computers debug?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2008/07/11/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-71/#comment-37446</guid>
		<description>[...] It involves critical sections! Let&#8217;s see whether we have an instance of Critical Section Corruption pattern. The first disappointment comes when !locks command takes ages to finish so we break [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It involves critical sections! Let&#8217;s see whether we have an instance of Critical Section Corruption pattern. The first disappointment comes when !locks command takes ages to finish so we break [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
