<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four causes of crash dumps</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/11/23/four-causes-of-crash-dumps/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 01:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: alessio porcacchia</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/11/23/four-causes-of-crash-dumps/#comment-11608</link>
		<dc:creator>alessio porcacchia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/11/23/four-causes-of-crash-dumps/#comment-11608</guid>
		<description>interesting and cool
but i don't see the explanation for turing machine of two states
for non congruent solutions on the set for all solution in base 2 :D
obiviously 
where S(a) ={0,1}
(for any) S(a) exist at least a solution exist a solution S(b) that is not a member for all the solutions S(a) 
the non congruent porcacchia's solution for algorithm in loop or in a crash 
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting and cool<br />
but i don&#8217;t see the explanation for turing machine of two states<br />
for non congruent solutions on the set for all solution in base 2 <img src='https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
obiviously<br />
where S(a) ={0,1}<br />
(for any) S(a) exist at least a solution exist a solution S(b) that is not a member for all the solutions S(a)<br />
the non congruent porcacchia&#8217;s solution for algorithm in loop or in a crash<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
