<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows service crash dumps in Vista</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Software Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reading Notebook: 09-November-09</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-103593</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reading Notebook: 09-November-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-103593</guid>
		<description>[...] Service threads (p. 287) - some typical thread stack traces can be seen in this case study that also show that service main thread calls control handler functions: http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Service threads (p. 287) - some typical thread stack traces can be seen in this case study that also show that service main thread calls control handler functions: <a href="http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-8650</guid>
		<description>This might be a solution but I need to check.

http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/18/local-crash-dumps-on-vista/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be a solution but I need to check.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/18/local-crash-dumps-on-vista/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/18/local-crash-dumps-on-vista/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsoft</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-8324</link>
		<dc:creator>newsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/01/windows-service-crash-dumps-on-vista/#comment-8324</guid>
		<description>I guess it might be related to "session 0 isolation".
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/vista/services.mspx

Microsoft did a lot of work in order to avoid "interactive services". All services windows go to session 0, while users are using session 1+.

So I guess it is pointless to pop up a debugger prompt in session 0 if nobody can click on it ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it might be related to &#8220;session 0 isolation&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/vista/services.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/vista/services.mspx</a></p>
<p>Microsoft did a lot of work in order to avoid &#8220;interactive services&#8221;. All services windows go to session 0, while users are using session 1+.</p>
<p>So I guess it is pointless to pop up a debugger prompt in session 0 if nobody can click on it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
