<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 27)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 02:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-767706</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 21:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-767706</guid>
		<description>~*k 1 lists the first frame only like thread info GDB command.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~*k 1 lists the first frame only like thread info GDB command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-741764</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-741764</guid>
		<description>Windows 10: !findthreads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 10: !findthreads</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-590535</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-590535</guid>
		<description>For Windows 8 the latest WinDbg 6.2.9200.16384 the parameter ff doesn't show stack traces so we can use 1f or 16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Windows 8 the latest WinDbg 6.2.9200.16384 the parameter ff doesn&#8217;t show stack traces so we can use 1f or 16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-376349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-376349</guid>
		<description>Added !for_each_thread</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added !for_each_thread</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-374817</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-374817</guid>
		<description>Added !sprocess command</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added !sprocess command</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Software Chorography and Chorology: A Definition</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-192738</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Software Chorography and Chorology: A Definition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-192738</guid>
		<description>[...] dumps have some extension in the dimension of narrativity because it is possible to get stack traces and other execution residue from them that provide partial fragments of a software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] dumps have some extension in the dimension of narrativity because it is possible to get stack traces and other execution residue from them that provide partial fragments of a software [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 105)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-173582</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crash Dump Analysis Patterns (Part 105)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-173582</guid>
		<description>[...] by the default analysis command (for example, !analyze -v WinDbg command) or by inspecting a stack trace collection. However if we didn&#8217;t see any exception thread it doesn&#8217;t mean that no exception had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] by the default analysis command (for example, !analyze -v WinDbg command) or by inspecting a stack trace collection. However if we didn&#8217;t see any exception thread it doesn&#8217;t mean that no exception had [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack trace collection, special process, LPC and critical section wait chains, blocked thread, coupled machines, thread waiting time and IRP distribution anomaly: pattern cooperation</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-168327</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stack trace collection, special process, LPC and critical section wait chains, blocked thread, coupled machines, thread waiting time and IRP distribution anomaly: pattern cooperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 14:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-168327</guid>
		<description>[...] was reported that new remote sessions couldn&#8217;t be created. A complete memory dump stack trace collection log lists a special process that would not normally be present in a fully initialized session: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was reported that new remote sessions couldn&#8217;t be created. A complete memory dump stack trace collection log lists a special process that would not normally be present in a fully initialized session: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 Common Mistakes in Memory Analysis (Part 8)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-158854</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 10 Common Mistakes in Memory Analysis (Part 8)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-158854</guid>
		<description>[...] a culprit component, DllA, or not? Could this blockage result from earlier problems? We search stack trace collection for any other anomalous activity (Semantic Split) and we find indeed a recurrent stack trace [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] a culprit component, DllA, or not? Could this blockage result from earlier problems? We search stack trace collection for any other anomalous activity (Semantic Split) and we find indeed a recurrent stack trace [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strong process coupling, stack trace collection, critical section coruption and wait chains, message box, self-diagnosis and hidden exception and dynamic memory corruption: pattern cooperation</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-147471</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strong process coupling, stack trace collection, critical section coruption and wait chains, message box, self-diagnosis and hidden exception and dynamic memory corruption: pattern cooperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/crash-dump-analysis-patterns-part-27/#comment-147471</guid>
		<description>[...] Stack trace collection shows several threads waiting for a critical section when allocating heap blocks or calling loader functions, for example: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Stack trace collection shows several threads waiting for a critical section when allocating heap blocks or calling loader functions, for example: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
