Comments on: GDB for WinDbg Users (Part 3) https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/06/28/gdb-for-windbg-users-part-3/ Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics Wed, 06 May 2026 05:37:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Dmitry Vostokov https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/06/28/gdb-for-windbg-users-part-3/#comment-37761 Dmitry Vostokov Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:11:21 +0000 https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/06/28/gdb-for-windbg-users-part-3/#comment-37761 Thanks! I thought before that Range parameter behaves like address ranges and doesn't take into account instruction boundaries. I should have tried :-) Thanks! I thought before that Range parameter behaves like address ranges and doesn’t take into account instruction boundaries. I should have tried :-)

]]> By: Alex https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/06/28/gdb-for-windbg-users-part-3/#comment-37736 Alex Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:46:56 +0000 https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/06/28/gdb-for-windbg-users-part-3/#comment-37736 "I don’t know the way to disassemble just N instructions in WinDbg." u . lN (lowercase L) 0:000> u . l3 ntdll!DbgBreakPoint: 7c901230 cc int 3 7c901231 c3 ret 7c901232 8bff mov edi,edi “I don’t know the way to disassemble just N instructions in WinDbg.”

u . lN

(lowercase L)

0:000> u . l3
ntdll!DbgBreakPoint:
7c901230 cc int 3
7c901231 c3 ret
7c901232 8bff mov edi,edi

]]>