<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside Vista Error Reporting (Part 1)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 01:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 自定义的 UnhandledExceptionFilter 未被调用分析一例</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-264024</link>
		<dc:creator>自定义的 UnhandledExceptionFilter 未被调用分析一例</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-264024</guid>
		<description>[...] Inside Vista Error Reporting (Part 1) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Inside Vista Error Reporting (Part 1) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>This makes sense to me. Your application handles the fault and it loads wer.dll explicitly to submit the report so WerFault.exe doesn't have the chance to be executed as in the case of unhandled exceptions.  

Thanks,
Dmitry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense to me. Your application handles the fault and it loads wer.dll explicitly to submit the report so WerFault.exe doesn&#8217;t have the chance to be executed as in the case of unhandled exceptions.  </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dmitry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus Brod</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus Brod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/05/19/inside-vista-error-reporting-part-1/#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>If an application explicitly uses the new WER APIs (WerReportSubmit &#38; friends) to submit problem reports, it doesn't seem to launch WerFault.exe. Instead, wermgr.exe is executed - but only if the WER_SUBMIT_OUTOFPROCESS option is set when calling WerReportSubmit(). If the option is not set, no external process is spawned.

At least this is what I observed in my own debugging sessions. Does this make any sense?

Claus Brod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an application explicitly uses the new WER APIs (WerReportSubmit &amp; friends) to submit problem reports, it doesn&#8217;t seem to launch WerFault.exe. Instead, wermgr.exe is executed - but only if the WER_SUBMIT_OUTOFPROCESS option is set when calling WerReportSubmit(). If the option is not set, no external process is spawned.</p>
<p>At least this is what I observed in my own debugging sessions. Does this make any sense?</p>
<p>Claus Brod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
