<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash Dump Analysis AntiPatterns (Part 2)</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/02/28/crash-dump-analysis-antipatterns-part-2/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crash Dump Analysis AntiPatterns (Part 4)</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/02/28/crash-dump-analysis-antipatterns-part-2/#comment-48327</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Crash Dump Analysis AntiPatterns (Part 4)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2007/02/28/crash-dump-analysis-antipatterns-part-2/#comment-48327</guid>
		<description>[...] thought to call it Wrong Dump pattern and place it into patterns category but after writing about Zippocricy I clearly see it as anti-pattern. It is not a rocket science to check process name in a dump [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] thought to call it Wrong Dump pattern and place it into patterns category but after writing about Zippocricy I clearly see it as anti-pattern. It is not a rocket science to check process name in a dump [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
