<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real Programmers - no impossible code</title>
	<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/</link>
	<description>Structural and Behavioral Patterns for Software Diagnostics, Forensics and Prognostics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Component Heap</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-135680</link>
		<dc:creator>Crash Dump Analysis &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Component Heap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-135680</guid>
		<description>[...] This story reminds me that when I learnt about COM in 90s I wanted to redesign my word processor written in C to have every paragraph, line and even word to be implemented as a COM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This story reminds me that when I learnt about COM in 90s I wanted to redesign my word processor written in C to have every paragraph, line and even word to be implemented as a COM [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Vostokov</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-89628</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Vostokov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-89628</guid>
		<description>Here is a comment from from one person quoted from old snippets on http://community.citrix.com/blogs/citrite/dmitryv:

"Dmitry, I tend to slightly disagree with you. Writing a word processor may show a lot of determination but does not entitle that person to only be considered a "real" programmer, versus other ones that do program tough tasks, realtime software or database related software, or design complex networking distributed applications and also deserve to be considered "real" programmers. At the same time if you need programmers who know how to debug the kernel then someone who has written a word processor might not be useful for what you have to give him. Of course you could say that the person can then learn anything quickly because they have written an editor before but that would sound elitist at best. In summary, you may miss quality programmers if you field off anyone who hasn't written a word processor/editor :)"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a comment from from one person quoted from old snippets on <a href="http://community.citrix.com/blogs/citrite/dmitryv:" rel="nofollow">http://community.citrix.com/blogs/citrite/dmitryv:</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Dmitry, I tend to slightly disagree with you. Writing a word processor may show a lot of determination but does not entitle that person to only be considered a &#8220;real&#8221; programmer, versus other ones that do program tough tasks, realtime software or database related software, or design complex networking distributed applications and also deserve to be considered &#8220;real&#8221; programmers. At the same time if you need programmers who know how to debug the kernel then someone who has written a word processor might not be useful for what you have to give him. Of course you could say that the person can then learn anything quickly because they have written an editor before but that would sound elitist at best. In summary, you may miss quality programmers if you field off anyone who hasn&#8217;t written a word processor/editor :)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reading Notebook: 23-Apr-09</title>
		<link>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-72037</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Generalist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Reading Notebook: 23-Apr-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>https://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/#comment-72037</guid>
		<description>[...] writing analysis functions (p. 180) - I used this when writing a word processor long time ago to check the consistency of internal structures: http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] writing analysis functions (p. 180) - I used this when writing a word processor long time ago to check the consistency of internal structures: <a href="http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dumpanalysis.org/blog/index.php/2006/12/16/real-programmers-no-impossible-code/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
